Support 2
125
72
"Project I work on has been in PJM interconnection queue since 2019. The federal NEPA review was Q1 of that — five years and counting. Two-year cap is the only thing that actually moves projects."
Truth in Data, agentically summarized.
Imposes statutory deadlines on federal environmental reviews under NEPA for energy and transmission projects, while preserving full review of cumulative impacts and tribal-consultation requirements.
2 support · 1 oppose
"Project I work on has been in PJM interconnection queue since 2019. The federal NEPA review was Q1 of that — five years and counting. Two-year cap is the only thing that actually moves projects."
"Tribal-consultation requirements *technically* preserved means nothing when the compressed timeline gives no actual room to consult meaningfully. The text preserves the requirement and erodes the practice. Words on paper."
"Two-year statutory cap is reasonable. If a project cannot be reviewed in two years with cumulative-impact and tribal-consultation preserved, the agency is the problem, not the timeline. Source: 18 years on transmission projects in the Panhandle."